.

TELL US: Should Convicted Teens Receive 'Fairer' Sentences?

New legislation is proposing teens convicted of murder before age 17 to be eligible for parole 15 years after being incarcerated.

Gov. Deval Patrick introduced a new piece of legislation on Monday in an effort to offer convicted teenagers a second chance earlier in their sentence. 

The proposal, "An Act to Reform the Juvenile Justice System in the Commonwealth", offers new plans regarding how the state treats teenagers who have been convicted of murder, according to MyFoxBoston.com.

Specifically, the plan aims "to create a fairer justice system for the state’s youth by extending the juvenile court jurisdiction" from age 17 to 18, and eliminating mandatory life sentences without parole for juveniles convicted of first-degree murder, according to an announcement from the Executive Department Office of Gov. Patrick Monday. 

If the proposal is passed, anyone aged 14-17 years who has been charged with first- or second-degree murder would be tried in juvenile court and not as an adult. 

“Every violent felon should be held accountable for their actions, even youth. But in sentencing every felon's circumstances should be considered, too, and youth itself is a special circumstance,” Patrick said in a statement Monday. “It is time for the Commonwealth's laws to reflect the value, in accord with the Supreme Court, that young people deserve every opportunity for rehabilitation and reform.”

Currently, convicted murderers receive an automatic life sentence without the possibility of parole. Under the new proposal, however, those convicted would be eligible for parole 15 to 25 years after their incarceration. The juvenile court could also sentence life without parole after first considering several factors, including the person’s immaturity, ability to appreciate the risk associated with, and consequences of, the person’s criminal misconduct, whether the person acted alone, the person’s intellectual capacity, and the likelihood that the offender is capable of change and would benefit from rehabilitation, among others, according to the announcement Monday.

The Commonwealth currently has 62 people serving life sentences for murders committed between the ages of 15 to 17 years, according to MyFoxBoston.com.

The legislation follows a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court that mandatory criminal sentences of life in prison without the possibility of parole, imposed on defendants who were younger than 18 when they committed their crimes, were unconstitutional. 

Meanwhile, lawmakers have offered alternative proposals, according to Boston.com, one of which would keep teen murderers behind bars for a minimum of 35 years.

What do you think about the new proposal? Should convicted teens have a chance at earlier parole? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below. 

Traci Longa January 30, 2013 at 02:25 PM
Coincidentally I was reading an article yesterday about a defense attorney in Vegas. She has a very interesting perspective and opinion on this coming from the front lines of a court system... www.theveldgroup.com/www/Las%20Vegas%20Life%20Article.pdf
Janet Sroczynski January 31, 2013 at 10:21 PM
Speaking of Las Vegas, there is the media-clip from Inside Edition's Jim Moret: "People Live in the Sewer Tunnels Beneath Las Vegas" at: http://www.AOL.com/video/people-live-in-the-sewer-tunnels-beneath-las-vegas/517657183/?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cd129%7Csec3_Ink2%26pLid%3D264100
Brandy G. February 01, 2013 at 04:36 PM
@paul, Mary Bell's case took place in the UK and their prison system is different from ours. I don't know if their system works on rehab in line with penalty, but I can say that ours does not and it should.
Jerry Chase February 08, 2013 at 02:37 AM
Where is the evidence to support the governor's rationale for "fairer" sentences? There isn't any.
cici January 14, 2014 at 06:51 AM
OK, so I read some of these and I feel like it should always be case by case in every legal situation. I definitely do not think any offenders in max security prisons should be let out just because. But I also do not think a child who is 17 should be with the adults. Prison is rough and it changes you forever. If there was any hope for rehabilitation after being thrown to wolves so to say, all hope would be gone then. Murder is a horrible, almost unforgivable crime and punishment is necessary. I find it interesting that Josh Gould,a convicted murder, who was 17 when the crime was committed, says on this blog that he thinks if you do the crime then do the time. I went to grade school with him and my father was in prison with him. He was a child and it took all my dad had to leave him there because of that. I do not know exactly what role he played in the murder but I do not think he should not be in prison with the adults. My thoughts and prayers go to all families affected. Rehabilitation has to be wanted before it can work.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »